It is content to be possible, to be admissible. For it maintains a relationship with this truth, with this expected agreement; a partial, fragmentary relationship, part of an original whole that must be reconstituted.\u00a0As a result, the proposals follow one another, linked together in the necessary order that is supposed to give the object its form and its raison d’\u00eatre<\/em>. But the newfound order’s resolution is inevitably side-stepped. Compagnie 7273 exhausts its nostalgia for the outcome: on the horizon, no salvation, but just like Francis Ponge would say, “the rage of expression”.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false,"raw":"Compagnie 7273 has a gift for clever titles, deceptively na\u00efve. A simple proposition, after all, doesn't commit to anything.\u00a0However, whether true or false, one must take it or leave it. The dilemma begins, the simplicity disappears and then the poison of doubt creeps in: will there be an agreement at the end of this proposal?\u00a0Will there ever be an end? Nothing is less certain.\u00a0The haphazard character of the proposition is precisely what the company 7273 has taken on. It's ontological fragility. It proves nothing : \"proof tires the truth\" (Braque).<\/h4>\r\nIt is content to be possible, to be admissible. For it maintains a relationship with this truth, with this expected agreement; a partial, fragmentary relationship, part of an original whole that must be reconstituted.\u00a0As a result, the proposals follow one another, linked together in the necessary order that is supposed to give the object its form and its raison d'\u00eatre<\/em>. But the newfound order's resolution is inevitably side-stepped. Compagnie 7273 exhausts its nostalgia for the outcome: on the horizon, no salvation, but just like Francis Ponge would say, \"the rage of expression\".\r\n\r\n "},"parent":0,"menu_order":30,"template":"","meta":{"_fr_post_content":"
La Compagnie 7273<\/strong>\u00a0a le don des titres rou\u00e9s, faussement ing\u00e9nus. Une\u00a0simple proposition<\/strong>, apr\u00e8s tout, \u00e7a n\u2019engage \u00e0 rien.\u00a0<\/span>Pourtant, vraie ou fausse, c\u2019est \u00e0 prendre ou \u00e0 laisser. Le dilemme commence, la simplicit\u00e9 dispara\u00eet et s\u2019insinue alors le poison du doute : y aura-t-il accord au terme de cette proposition ?\u00a0<\/span>Y aura-t-il jamais un terme ? Rien n\u2019est moins s\u00fbr.\u00a0C\u2019est justement ce caract\u00e8re al\u00e9atoire de la proposition qui est pris en charge par la compagnie 7273. Sa fragilit\u00e9 ontologique. Elle ne prouve rien : \u00ab les preuves fatiguent la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 \u00bb (Braque).<\/span><\/h4>\r\n